Drawing for STARFISH

USPTO serial 87377156

STARFISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARFISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah J Peckham

DEBORAH J PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for management, cataloging, accessing, transfer, storage, backup, archiving, deduplication and analysis of data, system metrics, and metadata; computer software to generate reports regarding computer data, system metrics, and metadata; computer software for managing computer storage, computer files, computer file systems, object stores, and computer applications; computer software for content management, data governance and application management; Computer software for storing and retrieving data in public and private clouds and object storesACTIVENov 3, 2013
035Business consulting services in the field of data storage, data, system metrics, and metadata management, data protection, file system management, and data archiving; business data analysis, namely, analysis of data, system metrics, and metadataACTIVENov 3, 2013
042computer consulting in the fields of data, system metrics, and metadata collection, governance, management, cataloging, accessing, transfer, storage, backup, archiving, deduplication, analysis, and reporting; provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for data and metadata management, namely, collecting, managing, cataloging, accessing, transferring, storing, backing up, archiving, deduplicating, and analyzing data, system metrics, and metadata; provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software featuring technology that allows the users to generate reports regarding computer data, system metrics, and metadata; design of data storage solutions for others, namely, design of hardware and software electronic data storage solutions for others; Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data and metadata storage and management in the fields of enterprise information technology, enterprise data storage, electronic data storage, and information management; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data and metadata storage and management in the fields of enterprise information technology, enterprise data storage, electronic data storage, and information management; cloud computing management, namely, computer services in the nature of remote and on-site management of cloud computing systems and applications for others; cataloging data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, creating computer and computer network based indexes of data, system metrics, and metadata for others using information technology; backup of data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, remote, on-site, and online backup of electronic data; archiving data, system metrics, and metadata, namely, electronic storage services for archiving electronic data; data migration services, namely, migration of electronic data between remote, on-site, and online data storage systems; data mining in the nature of accessing and analyzing data, system metrics, and metadataACTIVENov 3, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Feb 26, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 8, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance