USPTO serial 87377466
HUBBLE CASA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUBBLE CASA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H. HIEBERT SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLCTWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE, SUITE 2330BOSTON, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communication apparatus and devices; programmable electric control apparatus, systems, devices and installations; remote control apparatus for use with heating, lighting, air conditioning and security apparatus; software in the nature of a mobile application for remote monitoring and controlling of electronic apparatus and devices; wireless local area network video cameras; video cameras compatible with telephones, smartphones, tablet computers, computers and computer peripheral devices; video cameras for use in monitoring the status and location of animals, individuals, animate objects or inanimate objects; video cameras intended for use with software for remote monitoring of images, sound and data; security control apparatus; electronic and automatic access security apparatus; security video cameras and video monitors; intruder detection systems and apparatus; software to control building access and security systems; electronic access control systems for doors; electric door bells; door opening and closing detecting sensors; remote control apparatus for opening and closing doors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |