USPTO serial 87378483
RLVNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RLVNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gardnerville, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, crops; Athletic tops and bottoms for casual wear and gym attire; Beachwear; Bottoms; Bottoms for casual wear and gym attire; Combinations; Dresses for casual wear; Fashion hats; Headbands for clothing; Hoodies; Hoods; Jackets; Jackets for casual wear and gym attire; Loungewear; Shirts for casual wear and gym attire; Shoes for casual wear and gym attire; Short sets; Shorts for casual wear and gym attire; Ski wear; Skiwear; Sweaters for casual wear and gym attire; Sweatpants for casual wear and gym attire; Sweatshirts for casual wear and gym attire; Swim wear; Swimwear; T-shirts for casual wear and gym attire; Tops; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses | ACTIVE | May 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |