USPTO serial 87380815
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
Camille M. Miller COZEN O'CONNOR1650 Market StreetSuite 2800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote, adaptive and smart video monitoring systems consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair of robots used for security | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for use in database management, for use as spreadsheet, for word processing, for tracking and reporting documents, information and metrics in the field of security guard services; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management, for use as spreadsheet, for word processing, for tracking and reporting documents, information and metrics in the field of security guard services; computer software consultation; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management, for security desk management, for data storage, for tracking and reporting documents, information and metrics, for accounting, all in the field of security; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining applications, software and websites of others in the field of security; computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; non-downloadable software for use in integrating security software into security platforms and systems in the field of security services; evaluating and assessing on-site security computer programs for others; computer security consulting services in the fields of fire, safety and emergency and terrorism response; design and implementation of computer security programs for standing, patrol and console security, fire and life safety, and emergency and terrorism response; computer security consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; computer security threat analysis for protecting data from fraud and identity theft; computer security services, namely, electronic monitoring of credit reports, the Internet, and public records to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; monitoring of security computer systems for buildings and premises for protecting data and information from unauthorized access; computer security consulting services, namely, evaluating and assessing on-site security computer programs for others; remote monitoring of computer security systems for buildings for protecting data and information from unauthorized access; leasing of robots used for computer security services and monitoring robots used for computer security services; computer security consulting services in the field of data theft and identity theft | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services in the nature of security guard services; evaluating and assessing on-site physical security programs for others for the protection of people and tangible property; property surveillance and security protective services, namely, providing executive protection, civil protection, personal security consultation, home security consultations, personal body guarding, control of building environmental access and monitoring of security alarm systems; security guard services; security guard services, namely, provision of uniformed, unarmed security professionals; physical security consulting services in the fields of fire and life safety, and emergency and terrorism response; design and implementation of physical security programs, including standing, patrol and console security, fire and life safety, and emergency and terrorism response; forensic analysis of surveillance video for fraud and identity theft prevention purposes; identity verification, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; monitoring of security surveillance and alarm systems for buildings and premises; physical security consulting services, namely, evaluating and assessing on-site security programs for others for the protection of people and tangible property; providing property surveillance services, namely, monitoring security systems and security guarding for facilities; security protective services, namely, providing executive protection, personal security consultation, and personal body guarding; concierge services, namely, hotel concierge services, personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations, running errands and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs, all rendered in business establishments, office buildings, hotels, residential complexes and homes; licensing of computer software; remote monitoring of security alarm systems for buildings; remote monitoring of emergency and burglar alarms and dispatching emergency and police personnel to respond to alarms; remote, adaptive and smart video security surveillance services; leasing of robots used for physical security services and monitoring robots used for physical security services; property surveillance and security protective services, namely, control of on-site security systems for protecting people and tangible property | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |