USPTO serial 87383092
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne E. Naffziger
ANNE E NAFFZIGER LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTD1981 N BROADWAYSUITE 375WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Data analytic services for tracking audience demographics and effectiveness of marketing campaigns; marketing and advertising services via digital screen, mobile devices or personal computers | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of providing information in the field of music, music video, celebrity gossip, sports, and news; Providing entertainment news, non- downloadable movies, television programs, music videos, video content, music and digital signage for entertainment purposes via digital monitors and television screens and audio systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Providing a web hosting platform for providing entertainment information and news, non-downloadable movies, television programs, music videos, video content, music and digital signage via digital monitors and television screens and audio systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |