Drawing for VIEWFLEX

USPTO serial 87383535

VIEWFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSEN, AMANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIEWFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for pre-recorded games; digital signal processors; relays for radio and TV stations; record players; Electronic devices, namely, radio frequency repeaters used in long range communication for tracking and monitoring energy usage; emergency signal transmitters; computer software for encryption; radio receivers and monitors for the reproduction of sound and signals; shield cases for magnetic disks; computer software for controlling self-service terminals; transmitters of electronic signals; computer programs for the enabling of access or entrance control; transit switches, namely, electrical switches; cards bearing integrated circuits; computers for managing control devices for aircraftACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 28, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance