Drawing for AIHR

USPTO serial 87383556

AIHR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHWARZ, KATHLEEN MICHELLE HUD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIHR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy J. Grossman

STACY J. GROSSMAN LAW OFFICE OF STACY J. GROSSMAN888 SEVENTH AVENUE, 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the healthcare field, namely, software for managing, storing, analyzing, maintaining, processing, structuring, reviewing, building, editing, distributing, communicating, organizing, sharing, referencing, monitoring and integrating healthcare information; computer software for automating clinical, financial and administrative healthcare processesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for healthcare outcomes collection and management in the field of healthcare; computer software consulting services; health care consulting in the field of treatment outcomes analytics for drug, alcohol, and other healthcare providersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance