USPTO serial 87383816
SANBOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANBOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Bath mats; Carpet underlay; Carpets; Decorative wall hangings, not of textile; Door mats; Floor coverings; Floor mat systems comprised primarily of floor mats made of rubber; Floor mats, fire resistant, for fireplaces and barbecues; Gymnastic mats; Linoleum; Non-slip bathtub mats; Rugs; Textile wallpaper; Vinyl floor coverings; Wallpaper; Yoga mats; Anti-fatigue floor mat; Floor mats; Floor mats in the nature of non-slip pads for use under apparatus to prevent slippage | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |