USPTO serial 87383859
SHARK SPORT WATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARK SPORT WATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 SOUTH FIRST STREET12TH FLOORSAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Clocks; Jewellery cases; Necklaces; Rings; Watches; Jewellery charms; Presentation boxes for watches | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 28, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |