Drawing for RE:ACTUALLY

USPTO serial 87384354

RE:ACTUALLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RE:ACTUALLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane J. Mason

DIANE J. MASON Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFour Embarcadero Center27th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-4180

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; hair colorants; cosmetic preparations for skin care; facial cleansers; perfumes; hair care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance