USPTO serial 87384673
ROBOTS IN THE SKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBOTS IN THE SKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan H. Opalko
BRYAN H. OPALKO BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC501 Grant Street, Suite 200PITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and initiating countermeasures to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and controlling, either logically, autonomously or remotely, including using closed loop automated reasoning, other electrical and/or mechanical devices or systems, namely, cameras, radars, lidars, gunshot detectors, actuated lights, directional speaker devices, lasers, laser dazzlers, heat waves, microwaves, magnetic waves and nonlethal beams to initiate countermeasures to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and initiating non-lethal countermeasures to delay, deter or thwart the identified potential threat by overwhelming their senses of sight, sound and touch; security system comprising computer hardware and software intended for use with other electrical and/or mechanical devices or systems, namely, cameras, radars, lidars, gunshot detectors, actuated lights, directional speaker devices, lasers, laser dazzlers, heat waves, microwaves, magnetic waves and nonlethal beams to detect and identify potential threats and initiate real-time countermeasure sequences to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and controlling other electrical and/or mechanical devices or systems, namely, cameras, radars, lidars, gunshot detectors, actuated lights, directional speaker devices, lasers, laser dazzlers, heat waves, microwaves, magnetic waves and nonlethal beams to initiate countermeasures to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat and featuring embedded cyber encryption hardware, firmware and software using multifactor authentication down to the edge device level | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of security systems comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and initiating countermeasures to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; Design and development of security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and controlling, either logically, autonomously or remotely, including using closed loop automated reasoning, other electrical and/or mechanical devices or systems, namely, cameras, radars, lidars, gunshot detectors, actuated lights, directional speaker devices, lasers, laser dazzlers, heat waves, microwaves, magnetic waves and nonlethal beams to initiate countermeasures to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; Design and development of security system comprising software and hardware for identifying a potential threat and initiating non-lethal countermeasures to delay, deter or thwart the identified potential threat by overwhelming their senses of sight, sound and touch; Design and development of security system comprising computer hardware and software for use in connection with other electrical and/or mechanical devices or systems, namely, cameras, radars, lidars, gunshot detectors, actuated lights, directional speaker devices, lasers, laser dazzlers, heat waves, microwaves, magnetic waves and nonlethal beams to detect and identify potential threats and initiate real-time countermeasure sequences to delay, deter and/or thwart the identified potential threat; development of security system software intended for use in maintaining embedded cyber encryption hardware, firmware and software that uses multifactor authentication down to the edge device level; Design and development of security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Security Oracle, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Security Oracle, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROBOTS IN THE SKY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |