Drawing for MECARD TITAN

USPTO serial 87385207

MECARD TITAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPALE, LISA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MECARD TITAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane J. Mason

DIANE J. MASON LECLAIRRYAN LLP44 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE. 3100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board Games; Arcade video game machines; hand- held, non-electronic skill games; Video game machines; toys namely, soft dolls, puzzles, balloons, return top toys, toy figures attachable to pencils, children's multiple activity toys, bath toys, beach balls, dolls, doll accessories, doll playsets, electric action toys, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games, mechanical toys, toy mobiles, toy watches, and toy weapons; Dolls; playing cards; Card games; skis; snowboards; ascenders being mountaineering equipment; Climbers' harness; Golf bags with or without wheels; Golf balls; Golf gloves; golf equipment namely, balls, clubs, gloves, club covers; toy scooters; Athletic protective wrist pads for skating; Athletic protective elbow pads for skating; Athletic protective knee pads for skateboarding; Athletic protective arm pads for skating; Toy roller skates; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations, except confectionery and electric Christmas tree lights; Butterfly nets; Twirling batons; ride- on toys; Chess gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 6, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 6, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance