Drawing for CRITICALEG

USPTO serial 87386377

CRITICALEG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRITICALEG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

John M. Cone FERGUSON BRASWELL FRASER KUBASTA PC2500 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 600PLANO, TX 75093UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020furniture for media storage for use in data centers, namely, storage systems comprising shelves and drawers, and storage cabinetsACTIVE—
037installation services in the field of data center equipment and critical infrastructure used for airflow and temperature management, power distribution, and monitoring of alarm systems; installation of alarm systemsACTIVE—
039consulting and advising in the field of electric power distribution for data centersACTIVE—
042consulting and advising in the field of the design of data center infrastructure focusing on airflow, cooling and temperature management equipment, capacity and space usage; monitoring of third party data center infrastructure regarding temperature fluctuations and interrupted power supply and providing notification of related alertsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance