Drawing for PRINCE KONG

USPTO serial 87386932

PRINCE KONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRINCE KONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane J. Mason

DIANE J MASON DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 27SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board Games; Arcade video game machines; Game apparatus for playing action type target games sold as a unit; nets for ball games; hand-held, non-electronic skill games; Video game machines; toys namely, soft dolls, puzzles, balloons, return top toys, toy figures attachable to pencils, rubber balls, children's multiple activity toys, basketballs, bath toys, baseballs, beach balls, collectible toy figures, dolls, doll accessories, doll playsets, electric action toys, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games, footballs, mechanical toys, toy mobiles, toy vehicles, toy watches, and toy weapons; Dolls; playing cards; Card games; skis; snowboards; baseball gloves; athletic sporting goods, namely, athletic wrist, ankle and joint supports; shoulder pads for athletic use; elbow guards for athletic use; shin guards for athletic use; knee guards for athletic use; ascenders being mountaineering equipment; Climbers' harness; Golf bags with or without wheels; Golf balls; Golf gloves; golf equipment namely, balls, clubs, gloves, club covers; toy bicycles, namely, toy bicycles other than for transport; toy scooters; Athletic protective wrist pads for skating; Athletic protective elbow pads for skating; Athletic protective knee pads for skateboarding; Athletic protective arm pads for skating; Toy roller skates; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations, except confectionery and electric Christmas tree lights; Butterfly nets; Fishing tackle; Twirling batons; ride-on toys; Chess gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 7, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 28, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 18, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance