USPTO serial 87387320
MECARD BATTLE ARENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MECARD BATTLE ARENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane J. Mason
DIANE J MASON DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 27SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board Games; Arcade video game machines; Game apparatus for playing action type target games sold as a combined unit; nets for ball games; hand-held, non-electronic skill games; Video game machines; toys namely, soft dolls, puzzles, balloons, return top toys, toy figures attachable to pencils, rubber balls, children's multiple activity toys, basketballs, bath toys, baseballs, beach balls, collectible toy figures, dolls, doll accessories, doll playsets, electric action toys, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games, footballs, mechanical toys, toy mobiles, toy vehicles, toy watches, and toy weapons; Toys for domestic pets; Dolls; playing cards; Card games; skis; snowboards; baseball gloves; athletic sporting goods, namely, athletic wrist, ankle and joint supports; shoulder pads for athletic use; elbow guards for athletic use; shin guards for athletic use; knee guards for athletic use; ascenders being mountaineering equipment; Climbers' harness; Golf bags with or without wheels; Golf balls; Golf gloves; golf equipment namely, balls, clubs, gloves, club covers; toy bicycles other than for transport; toy scooters; Athletic protective wrist pads for skating; Athletic protective elbow pads for skating; Athletic protective knee pads for skateboarding; Athletic protective arm pads for skating; Toy roller skates; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations, except confectionery and electric Christmas tree lights; Butterfly nets; Fishing tackle; Twirling batons; ride-on toys; Chess games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |