Drawing for BF

USPTO serial 87387729

BF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publication of books; Publication of texts, books, journals; Publishing and issuing scientific papers in relation to medical technology; Publishing audio books in the field of technology, travel, education, and design; Publishing books in the field of technology, travel, education, and design; Publishing e-books in the field of technology, travel, education, and design; Publishing of books and reviews; Publishing of books, e-books, audio books, music and illustrations; Publishing of books, magazines; Publishing of website and print publications in the nature of electronic publications; Publishing of reviews; Book publishing; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of technology, travel, education, and design; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Music publishing services; Newspaper publishing; Online electronic publishing of books and periodicals; Open-access publishing services, namely, publication of electronic books, journals, and magazines in the field of technology, travel, education, and designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Nov 15, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 7, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance