Drawing for 360 MUSIC ARCHITECTURE

USPTO serial 87387768

360 MUSIC ARCHITECTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 360 MUSIC ARCHITECTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl Klein

KARL KLEIN KLEIN LAW FIRM, P.L.800 BRICKELL AVE STE PH01MIAMI, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Music selection services for use in marketing, namely, sound design for a brand through combining on-property environmental sound design with off-property extensions of that sound designACTIVEFeb 15, 2011
041Using dynamic media to allow the listener to experience the brand's sound design off-property at a time and place of their choosing, namely, providing on-line music, not downloadableACTIVEFeb 15, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 24, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance