Drawing for BIOREMARKABLE

USPTO serial 87388205

BIOREMARKABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOREMARKABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric R. Moran

ERIC R. MORAN MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE31ST FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60606-6709

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001diagnostic reagents and chemical test kits for testing bodily fluids for scientific and laboratory use and for scientific and medical research; diagnostic reagents for medical laboratory useACTIVE—
005medical diagnostic reagents; diagnostic reagents and test kits for medical use comprised of medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing body fluidsACTIVE—
009laboratory equipment, namely, a system comprising primarily of laser equipment for molecular and atomic detection used in clinical diagnostics and clinical and scientific research; a measuring apparatus research tool, namely, a system comprising primarily of laser apparatus for antibody and antigen detection for use in product, life science, pharmaceutical, and clinical research and development; computer software for use with the aforementioned goods; computer software for use with an immunoassay apparatus for analysis of bodily fluids and clinical diagnosisACTIVE—
010immunoassay apparatus for blood analysis and clinical diagnosisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance