USPTO serial 87388843
THA COCO CRAFT WITH HEART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THA COCO CRAFT WITH HEART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra Spurr
Alexandra Spurr Sausser Summers, PC4846 Payton StreetSanta Barbara, CA 93111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit snacks; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Fruit chips; Fruit preserves; Frozen fruits; Crystallized fruits; Coconut, desiccated; Coconut butter for food; Fruit, stewed; Fruit jellies; Fruit salads; Coconut milk; Coconut milk for culinary purposes; Coconut milk-based beverages; Coconut oil for food; Dried coconuts; Grated coconut; dried fruit-based snack bars; Fruit jellies not being confectionery; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts for use as ingredients of nutritional supplements and vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Fruit jelly candy; Granola-based snack bars primarily made of granola and also containing dried fruit | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Coconut shell; Fresh coconuts; Fruit, fresh | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Coconut milk used as beverage; Coconut water; Sparkling coconut water; Fruit drinks and juices; Beers; Mineral and aerated waters; Nonalcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Fruit beverages and fruit juices; Syrups for making beverages; Powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Vegetable juices beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thai Coconut Public Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named THA COCO CRAFT WITH HEART
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |