CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHARP OPEN ARCHITECTURE PLATFORM

USPTO serial 87388848

SHARP OPEN ARCHITECTURE PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, AHSEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHARP OPEN ARCHITECTURE PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD, 11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic information display screens; digital signage; software for displaying digital signage; computer programs used to operate digital signsACTIVE—
042Providing information about design and development of computer software; providing temporary access to non-downloadable computer programs on data networks used to access and operate digital signageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance