USPTO serial 87389446
TEAL SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAL SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
John C. Stringham John C. Stringham60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000WORKMAN NYDEGGERSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote controls for drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer software for the command, control and operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for the autonomous waypoint navigation, takeoff, landing, loiter of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) featuring related control algorithms; computer software for the remote control and monitoring of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for sending commands and other information to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for displaying information, video, and images sent from the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer software, hardware and peripheral devices, namely, satellite-aided navigation systems comprised of sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer and GPS which can be used for drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer application software for mobile phones, tablets, and handheld computers, for use in managing, controlling, and tracking drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and remotely-controlled video camera; software development kits (SDKs) comprised of computer software for developing computer software and application programming interfaces software (APIs), namely, for use in developing applications and programs for use in managing, controlling and tracking drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and remotely-controlled video camera; accessories for drones and non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and unmanned aerial systems (UASs), namely, remote controls, camera mounts, and remote flight controllers, namely, electronic speed controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | drones; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |