USPTO serial 87389453
WIN THE FLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TRICIA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIN THE FLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Stringham
John C. Stringham Workman Nydegger60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote controls for drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer software for the command, control and operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for the autonomous waypoint navigation, takeoff, landing, loiter of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) featuring related control algorithms; computer software for the remote control and monitoring of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for sending commands and other information to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and for displaying information, video, and images sent from the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer software, hardware and peripheral devices, namely, satellite-aided navigation systems comprised of sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer and GPS which can be used for drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); computer application software for mobile phones, tablets, and handheld computers, for use in managing, controlling, and tracking drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and remotely-controlled video camera; software development kits (SDKs) comprised of computer software for developing computer software and application programming interfaces software (APIs), namely, for use in developing applications and programs for use in managing, controlling and tracking drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and remotely-controlled video camera; accessories for drones and non-toy unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and unmanned aerial systems (UASs), namely, remote controls, camera mounts, and remote flight controllers, namely, electronic speed controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, development, engineering and testing services in the field of drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Design, integration and testing of information technology systems associated with drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for managing, controlling and tracking, and communicating with drones, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and remotely-controlled video camera; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for managing, controlling and tracking, and communicating with drones, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and remotely-controlled video camera; Cloud computing featuring software for use in managing, controlling and tracking, and communicating with drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Web application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in managing, controlling and tracking drones, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and remotely-controlled video camera; Design and development of computers, drone and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) hardware and computer software systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |