USPTO serial 87389901
DASHING FINE GIFTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DASHING FINE GIFTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Deerfield, IL
Deerfield, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Selena M. Spritz
Selena M. Spritz WALGREEN CO.104 WILMOT ROADMS #144ADEERFIELD, IL 60015Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2021 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2021 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |