USPTO serial 87389906
ADEISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADEISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Young
James L. Young Westman, Champlin & Koehler P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical Instruments and apparatus; surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use; medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopaedic, reconstructive, neurosurgery, endoscopic, endovascular, cardiovascular, angioplasty, exploratory, elective, emergency, cosmetic, transplant, robotic and laparoscopic surgery procedures; dental apparatus and instruments, namely, explorers, straight probes and periodontal probes, retractors, picks, burrs, locators, mirrors, and drill bits; veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, scissors, blades, chisels, cutters, and forceps, all for veterinary use; artificial limbs, artificial eyes, and artificial teeth; Orthopedic apparatus and instruments for diagnostic and therapeutic use; suture materials; Non-living implants, namely, implants consisting of artificial materials and implants comprising natural, non-living materials; Orthopedic insoles; medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic fixation device used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgery; orthopedic fixation devices in the nature of fixation implants comprised of artificial material; Implants consisting of artificial materials, namely, artificial anatomical implants; Orthopedic devices for medical diagnostic use; Dental implants and cranio-maxillofacial implants made of artificial materials; dental instruments, namely, metal-based dental implant surgical guides; metal-based surgical instruments; orthopaedic implants made of artificial materials; fracture fixation components, namely, fixation implants comprised of artificial material; rehabilitative devices, namely, body rehabilitation apparatus for medical purposes; smart implants of artificial materials, namely, implantable devices comprising patient monitoring sensors and wireless telemetry devices for medical applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others, namely, 3D printing of medical models, implants, prosthetics and surgical instruments, dental implants, cranio-maxillofacial implants, metal-based surgical guides, metal-based surgical instruments, orthopaedic implants, fracture fixation components, rehabilitative devices, and smart implants, namely, implantable devices with integrated sensors and wireless telemetry; Custom manufacturing of prosthetics, namely, 3D manufacturing services in the field of dental implants, craniomaxillofacial implants, metal-based surgical guides, metal-based surgical instruments, orthopaedic implants, fracture fixation components, rehabilitative devices, and smart implants, namely, implantable devices with integrated sensors and wireless telemetry; custom manufacturing of prosthetics in the nature of computer aided milling, rapid prototyping, additive manufacturing and 3D printing; 3D printing; 3D printing of medical apparatuses specific to patient spinal and bone structure; 3D printing of reconstructive bones in humans and animals; 3D printing of dental implants, cranio-maxillofacial implants, metal-based surgical guides, metal-based surgical instruments, orthopaedic implants, fracture fixation components, rehabilitative devices, and smart implants, namely, implantable devices with integrated sensors and wireless telemetry; 3D printing of medical models, implants and surgical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product design, engineering, development and testing of medical instruments and apparatuses for surgeons; custom design and development of patient specific medical instruments, prosthetics and implants, dental implants, cranio-maxillofacial implants, metal-based surgical guides, metal-based surgical instruments, orthopaedic implants, fracture fixation components, rehabilitative devices, and smart implants, namely, implantable devices with integrated sensors and wireless telemetry; Design of models of tissue, tumors and implants for use in the field of medicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, pre-surgical planning and patient evaluation services to create 3D patient-specific dental implants, cranio-maxillofacial implants, metal-based surgical guides, metal-based surgical instruments, orthopaedic implants, fracture fixation components, rehabilitative devices, and smart implants, namely, implantable devices with integrated sensors and wireless telemetry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Additive Design in Surgical Solutions Centre Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ADEISS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |