USPTO serial 87390227
M&P SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHWARZ, KATHLEEN MICHELLE HUD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M&P SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hara K. Jacobs
HARA K JACOBS BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Knives; hunting knives; fishing knives; knives for hobby use; leather sheaths for knives; tactical knives; pocket knives; cutlery; sport knives; utility knives; pen knives; folding knives; fixed blade knives; multi-purpose tools, namely, multi-function hand tools comprised of knives and hand-operated can openers; hatchets; machetes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |