USPTO serial 87390447
FALCON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEMI, XHENETA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FALCON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile and Jason E. Garcia
KATHERINE M. BASILE AND JASON E. GARCIA REED SMITH LLPP.O. BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processors; microprocessors; integrated circuits; microcontrollers; microcontroller-based devices; wearable microcontroller-based devices; microcontroller-based devices that connect to the Internet; GPS tracking and navigation devices; Computer software and navigation apparatus all for use with drone and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles; Computer hardware and software systems for remotely controlling, monitoring, and tracking unmanned aerial, land and sea vehicles; Computer hardware and software systems for controlling, managing, and tracking, intelligent robots; Navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers, GPS tracking and navigation devices, gyroscope and accelerometers; Remote controls for unmanned aerial vehicle; Remote controls for intelligent robots; Computer software platforms for communications; Computer software and hardware for communicating audio, video and data; Computer software and hardware for use in managing, controlling and tracking drones; downloadable mobile applications for controlling, monitoring, tracking, communicating and collecting data via drones; Cameras; batteries; power supply adapters; chargers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |