Drawing for FALCON

USPTO serial 87390486

FALCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADEMI, XHENETA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FALCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile and Jason E. Garcia

KATHERINE M. BASILE AND JASON E. GARCIA REED SMITH LLPP.O. BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Drones, unmanned vehicles; remote control aerial, land and sea vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or waterACTIVEDec 11, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 29, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance