Drawing for INTEL FALCON

USPTO serial 87390489

INTEL FALCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADEMI, XHENETA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEL FALCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

KATHERINE M. BASILE REED SMITH LLPP.O. BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and navigation apparatus for remotely controlling, monitoring, and tracking small drones with a payload that does not exceed 50 kilograms and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles that do not exceed 50 kilograms, excluding fixed-wing aircraft; computer hardware and software systems for remotely controlling, monitoring, and tracking unmanned land and sea vehicles, small drones that do not exceed 50 kilograms and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles that do not exceed 50 kilograms, excluding fixed-wing aircraft; navigation apparatus in the nature of on-board computers for small drones that do not exceed 50 kilograms and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles that do not exceed 50 kilograms, excluding fixed-wing aircraft; GPS tracking and navigation devices, gyroscope and accelerometers all for small drones that do not exceed 50 kilograms and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles that do not exceed 50 kilograms, excluding fixed-wing aircraft; downloadable mobile applications for controlling, monitoring, tracking, communicating and collecting data via small drones that do not exceed 50 kilograms and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles that do not exceed 50 kilograms, excluding fixed-wing aircraft; all of the foregoing excluding radios for communication of voice, data, images or video and further excluding goods for use in radios for communication of voice, data, images or video and further excluding drones and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles for military, homeland security, customs or border control use and further excluding goods for use in or with drones and remote-controlled aircraft and vehicles for military, homeland security, customs or border control useACTIVE—
012Small drones with a payload that does not exceed 50 kilograms, and remote-controlled aircraft and aerial vehicles (UAVs) that do not exceed 50 kilograms excluding fixed-wing aircraft; all of the foregoing excluding goods for military, homeland security, customs and border control useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 25, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance