USPTO serial 87390512
SWEET VIBRATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5319043Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2017
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEET VIBRATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY DAY LAW FIRM9977 NORTH 90TH STREET SUITE 155SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Sex toys; Adult sexual stimulation aids, namely, vibrators | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 20, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2018 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |