USPTO serial 87391733
PRICE.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2018
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with PRICE.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW CANAAN, CT
NEW CANAAN, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PAP.O. BOX 398538c/o TrademarkRenewals.comMIAMI BEACH, FL 33239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, conducting analytics and making recommendations regarding price setting, price testing, price execution, price management, revenue management, promotion setting, promotion testing, promotion management, temporary price reductions, markdown management, competitive price tracking, price analysis, dynamic pricing, products and pricing for up-selling, cross-selling, bundling, demand forecasting, and customer lifetime value | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2018 |
| 042 | Software as a services (SAAS), namely, providing software for conducting analytics and making recommendations regarding price setting, price testing, price execution, price management, revenue management, promotion setting, promotion testing, promotion management, temporary price reductions, markdown management, competitive price tracking, price analysis, dynamic pricing, products and pricing for up-selling, cross-selling, bundling, demand forecasting, and customer lifetime value; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to conduct analytics and make recommendations regarding price setting, price testing, price execution, price management, revenue management, promotion setting, promotion testing, promotion management, temporary price reductions, markdown management, competitive price tracking, price analysis, dynamic pricing, products and pricing for up-selling, cross-selling, bundling, demand forecasting, and customer lifetime value | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |