USPTO serial 87392783
DROV TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2019
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with DROV TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmond, OK, US
Edmond, OK, US
Oklahoma City, OK, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chase C. Webb
Chase C. Webb MCAFEE & TAFT211 NORTH ROBINSON8TH FLOOR, TWO LEADERSHIP SQUAREOKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Vehicle safety and vehicle communication equipment, namely, electronic tire pressure measurement and management systems comprised of embedded microprocessors and sensors reading wheel temperature, brakes, bearings, tire pressure, loads, outside temperature, altimeters, global position from vehicle components and communications; vehicle safety equipment, namely, electronic tire monitoring system comprised of embedded microprocessors and sensors reading wheel temperature, brakes, bearings, tire pressure, loads, outside temperature, altimeters, global position from vehicle components and communications; mechanical tire monitoring system comprised of embedded microprocessors and sensors reading wheel temperature, brakes, bearings, tire pressure, loads, outside temperature, altimeters, global position from vehicle components and communications; on-board computer and sensor technology for monitoring conditions of an operating vehicle and providing warning and assistance based on vehicle sensor data, namely, computer hardware and sensors for determining position, velocity, acceleration, tire pressure, and temperature; computer software and downloadable computer software applications for use in passenger vehicles and in the transportation, trucking, and freight industries to monitor and manage vehicle operating conditions, tire pressure, provide automatic inflation of the tires, provide warning and assistance based on vehicle sensor data, and generate reports regarding the same and for use in providing an on-line user interface and portal regarding the same; computer software a for use in connection with vehicle monitoring, tire pressure monitoring and status, providing warning and assistance based on vehicle sensor data and computer hardware, and vehicle tracking devices comprised of image sensors, transmitters, receivers and global positioning satellite receivers, all for use in connection with vehicle monitoring, tire pressure monitoring and status, providing warning and assistance based on vehicle sensor data | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2018 |
| 012 | Apparatus for inflation and control of pressure of vehicle tires, namely, automatic tire inflation valves, wheel valves, for automotive vehicles, cars, trucks, semi-trailer trucks, commercial vehicles, freight vehicles, buses and heavy duty vehicles | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2016 |
| 042 | [ Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in passenger vehicles and in the transportation, trucking, and freight industries to monitor and manage vehicle operating conditions, tire pressure, provide automatic inflation of the tires, provide warning and assistance based on vehicle sensor data, and generate reports regarding the same; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the field of vehicle monitoring for use in providing vehicle safety and maintenance data recording, collection, and reporting; providing an interactive website in the field of vehicle monitoring for safety purposes and for purposes of remotely checking status of motor vehicle operating systems, namely, tire pressure, fuel efficiency ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Drov, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Drov, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Drov, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DROV TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |