Drawing for HBC FOUNDATION'S HEADFIRST PROGRAM

USPTO serial 87394315

HBC FOUNDATION'S HEADFIRST PROGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HBC FOUNDATION'S HEADFIRST PROGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie Howard

Melanie Howard Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, promoting mental health awarenessACTIVE—
036Charitable services, namely, providing grants and donations to mental health organizations; Charitable fundraising services by means of organizing and conducting projects to promote awareness of mental health issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 2, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 25, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 27, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 11, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance