USPTO serial 87395217
STARTIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STARTIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winter Haven, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzan Hixon
SUZAN HIXON HIXON LAW PLLC8381 WEST HAL ROGERS PKWYLONDON, KY 40741Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries; battery chargers; battery chargers for use with golf carts; jumper cables; jump starters; battery jump starters; battery packs; power battery packs; battery packs for golf carts; jump starters for golf cart chargers; jump start charging systems; jump start charging systems for golf carts; portable power supplies; portable power supplies for golf carts; portable battery charger systems consisting primarily of battery charging devices, charge controllers and battery cables; portable battery charger systems consisting primarily of battery charging devices, charge controllers and battery cables for golf carts; power inverters; power inverters for golf carts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |