Drawing for BUILD IN BUSINESS TO LEARN

USPTO serial 87397491

BUILD IN BUSINESS TO LEARN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILD IN BUSINESS TO LEARN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ilene B. Tannen

ILENE B. TANNEN JONES DAY250 VESEY STREETNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing continuing professional education courses in the field of experiential education pedagogyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 23, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 5, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 14, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 4, 2017ASDFASSIGNMENT CHANGE WITHDRAWN
Oct 4, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance