USPTO serial 87397637
COZYMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, JULIE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COZYMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hyun Jong Park
HYUN JONG PARK PARK & ASSOCIATES IP LAW, P.C.265 BIC DR.SUITE 106MILFORD, CT 06461Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Vibrating massage apparatus; electric massage apparatus for household use; esthetic massage apparatus for business use or household use; massage apparatus for medical purposes; bed vibrators; thermal packs for first aid purposes; electric heating pads for medical purposes; abdominal pads for medical purposes; abdominal belts for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |