USPTO serial 87397773
CRUSHED FRUIT BARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2019
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRUSHED FRUIT BARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRAMINGHAM, MA, US
Minneapolis, MN, US
Minneapolis, MN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 SOUTH 6TH STREETSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen confections | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Aug 13, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Aug 13, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Nov 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Nov 22, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Nov 22, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| May 22, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | โ |
| May 22, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | โ |
| Jan 15, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Apr 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |