Drawing for TEOCO

USPTO serial 87397795

TEOCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5538271Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2018
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with TEOCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

Rebecca Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy; business consulting services in the telecommunications industry; business management and business consulting in the field of telecommunications, namely, data analytics, and cost management; business consultation in the field of telecommunications expense managementACTIVEMar 31, 1998
036Financial management and consulting for businesses in the field of telecommunications, namely, financial analyticsACTIVEMar 31, 1998
042Consultancy services in the field of technical support, namely, consultancy in the field of monitoring telecommunications networks for performance and availability; consultancy services in the field of machine-to-machine communication and the Internet of things technology; consulting services in the field of testing of electronic components, devices and systems; scientific and technological services, namely, conducting field and laboratory testing of electronic components, devices and systems to ensure satisfaction of performance requirements; consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; design and development of wireless computer networks; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in telecommunications network optimization and monitoring; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for automated telecommunications network design and network planning, namely, radio planning, backhaul planning and capacity planning, wireless network planning, namely, GSM, UMTS, LTE, wireless local area networks and small cell planning; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for geo-located traffic visualization, network performance data visualization, measurement-based spectrum refarming, radio access network configuration management, radio access network optimization and analytics; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data analytics, namely, financial, digital, location, customer, and circuit analytics; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in customer service and customer analytics in the telecommunications field; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for use in telecom expense management; software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for self organizing network (SON) control and analytics; providing network operations center (NOC) services in the nature of computer consulting services in the area of network infrastructure systems and in analysis, assembly, integration and monitoring of information technology infrastructure for others; telecommunications technology consulting for businesses, namely, network monitoring and routing managementACTIVEMar 31, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 20, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2024E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 14, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 2, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance