USPTO serial 87398729
KIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Sommers
MARK SOMMERS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Recorded computer game programs, downloadable electronic game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Recorded game software for mobile phones; Video game software; Interactive multimedia computer game programs; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; video game cartridges and cassettes; Computer game cartridges; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for electronic games, video games and computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Portable games with liquid crystal displays, Hand held units for playing electronic games, Home video game machines, Video game machines, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen; Games adapted for use with television receivers, Amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers only; games adapted for use with television receivers; portable games with liquid crystal displays; electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; Apparatus for electronic games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; home video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing of mobile game center, arranging and conducting of mobile video and computer game competitions, providing online non-downloadable game software; providing online computer games; electronic games services provided by means of the internet, Providing and operating of amusement facilities, providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users; Provisions of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the internet; providing a web-based system and on-line portal for customers to participate in on-line gaming, operation and coordination of game tournaments, leagues and tours for recreational computer game playing purposes; providing information on-line relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games; electronic games services provided by means of a global communication network; organization of electronic game competitions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |