Drawing for DRIPCATCHER

USPTO serial 87398807

DRIPCATCHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIPCATCHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald S. Holland

DONALD S HOLLAND LAW OFFICE OF DONALD S HOLLANDPO BOX 60537LONGMEADOW, MA 01116UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021paint bucketACTIVEJun 30, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 17, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 17, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 17, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 17, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 28, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 28, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance