USPTO serial 87399153
MAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARCIA, CLAUDIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan Bethell
RUTH KHALSA LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE PC446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, headwear, footwear; Headbands; T-shirts; Shirts; Hoodies; Sweatshirts; Leggings; Tank tops; Long sleeve shirts; Shorts; Pants; Athletic uniforms; Athletic tights; Tights; Athletic footwear; Gym suits | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |