Drawing for ODDYSEE

USPTO serial 87399269

ODDYSEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ODDYSEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Conley and Shabnam Malek

AMANDA CONLEY AND SHABNAM MALEK Brand & Branch LLP1305 Franklin Street, Suite 220Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing seminars and workshops in the field of business development and management, agriculture, and agricultural equipment; educational services, namely, conducting informal on-line programs in the fields of business and agriculture, and printable materials distributed therewith; conducting guided tours of retail and agricultural facilities; providing non-downloadable on-line videos featuring business advice and tours of retail and agricultural facilities; providing business education programs to emerging and start-up companies; peer to peer coaching in the field of business development and management, agriculture, and agricultural equipment; educational services, namely, providing museum displays and exhibits on the subject of cannabis; entertainment services, namely, providing an ongoing radio program on the subjects of business, investment, and cannabis; providing online current events news and information in the fields of business, investment, and cannabisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 19, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 27, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance