Drawing for SPEEDROOMMATING

USPTO serial 87399508

SPEEDROOMMATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDROOMMATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chelseaa Bush

CHELSEAA BUSH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP379 LYTTON AVENUEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036real estate management; real estate agencies; real estate appraisal; leasing of real estate; rental of offices; renting of apartments and flats; financial evaluation of real estate; information, advisory and consultancy services, all relating to the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 7, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 7, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance