USPTO serial 87405091
BUDLABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUDLABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Welch
David R. Welch DR Welch, Attorneys at Law500 S. Grand AvenueSuite 1800Los Angeles, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable mobile application software, namely, software for providing information to growers regarding proper growing techniques, including a nutrient calculator, custom feeding recipes, information regarding nutrient products, user-generated feeding recipes, access to qualified experts and a GPS locator to find where to purchase applicant's nutrient products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |