USPTO serial 87410336
BUTECH BLISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VIGIL, JACOB EUGENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUTECH BLISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Scarbrough
JAMES E. SCARBROUGH FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUE, 5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metal extrusion presses; forging machines; machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; shearing machines for metalworking; processing machines for metal; roller leveler machines having rollers for leveling or flattening sheets of metal; scrap metal chopping machines; metal coiling machine; stretch leveling cut-to-length lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; temper mill cut-to-length lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; roller leveling cut-to-length lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; multi-blanking lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; slitting lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; push-pull pickling lines in the nature of machines for processing metal; shape correction systems in the nature of machines for processing metal; hydraulic roller levelers; shearing machines for processing metal, namely, processing line shears including rotary, drum, hydraulic, flying and direct drive shears; side trimmers in the nature of machines for processing metal; scrap choppers; hot strip mill (HSM) shears for processing metal; temper mills; hydraulic gauge control (HGC) cylinders for precisely positioning work rolls in a rolling mill; downcoilers; plate levelers for correcting the flatness or shape of metal plates; roll changing systems for exchanging work rolls and back up rolls in a rolling mill; coil cars for transporting and lifting metal coils in a process line; extrusion equipment for extruding a metal billet into a structural shape; vacuum arc re-melt (VAR), electro-slag re-melt (ESR), plasma arc melting (PAM), and electron beam melting (EBM) vessels and hearths being parts of smelting machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |