Drawing for EZIP

USPTO serial 87411994

EZIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EZIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Gray, Jr.

Edward W. Gray, Jr. FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 SOUTH LASALLE STREETSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services in the field of managing and marketing intellectual property assets; consulting regarding intellectual property business risk mitigation processes; intellectual property business consultation services; intellectual property business information management; business management; business management consulting; business research; business risk management; business risk assessment servicesACTIVE—
036Consulting services in the field of valuation of intellectual property assetsACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in business intelligence in the field of intellectual property assessment, management and marketing for managing intellectual property assets and determining the value of those assets; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; application service provider featuring software for providing a variety of on-line databases in the field of intellectual property transaction processing to upload intellectual property transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports relevant to intellectual property assets; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management in the field of intellectual property to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data in the field of intellectual property; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of intellectual property knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks in the field of intellectual property; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of intellectual property knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information in the field of intellectual property; product research; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network in the field of intellectual property; computer software consulting; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for assessing patent applications and searching databases; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS) in the field of intellectual property; searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks for others; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for viewing, analyzing, filtering and rating results of a patent search; providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to assess patent applications and search patent databases; software as a services (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in assessing patent applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 14, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 6, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 15, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance