Drawing for GROWSMITH

USPTO serial 87415017

GROWSMITH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRINGER, DANIEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GROWSMITH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick Schweihs

PATRICK SCHWEIHS Copymark Law Group, LLC543 Brier StKenilworth, IL 60043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services in the agricultural fieldABANDONEDDec 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 20, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 20, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance