USPTO serial 87415888
SIMPLYSMART CUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5361515Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2017
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLYSMART CUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danica L. Mathes
Danica L. Mathes Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 1900Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automation systems for homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, HVAC, security, safety and other monitoring and control applications for homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures; security systems for homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures comprising doorbell video recorder, video recorders, video servers, electronic glass break detector, motion detector, security alarms, smoke detector, door and window sensors for sensing when a door or window is opened; telecommunication base station units for controlling wireless home and personal security devices; electronic doorbells; electronic wireless LAN enabled doorbells; indoor/outdoor security camera with electronic doorbell, motion sensor, 2-way audio, and infrared night vision; security camera with smoke detector alarm alert, electronic doorbell, motion sensor, 2-way audio, and infrared night vision; consumer electronic products, namely, doorbells, motion sensors and monitoring equipment, namely, video monitors and video cameras for monitoring the interior and exterior of homes, retail stores, offices, and other structures for security and surveillance; security cameras, motion-activated cameras; security cameras, namely, IP (Internet protocol) cameras; video capture devices, namely, video monitors and video cameras and related software in the nature of downloadable software for video monitoring a user's home, office and other facilities; security cameras, namely, motion-activated, phone-activated, doorbell-activated, voice-activated, and remotely-activated IP (Internet protocol) cameras; smoke detectors; carbon monoxide detectors; anti-intrusion alarms; burglar alarms; motion detectors; electronic glass break detectors; remote control units, keypads and control panels for security systems and home automation devices; electronic door locks; lights, namely, light systems comprising light sensors and switches; lighting systems, namely, lighting controls; lighting controllers; lighting control apparatus; electric control devices for lighting fixtures; automated lighting installations featuring motion detection, slim design for use on multi-throw switch plates, timers, welcome home and random-away lighting features, and manual control; dual independent electric socket control receptacle, namely, multimedia outlets with dual USB ports and backlight/nightlight; electric sockets; wireless enabled electrical plug outlets; motion sensors and monitoring equipment, namely, video monitors and video cameras; video monitors and video cameras for monitoring the interior and exterior of homes, retail stores, offices and other structures for security and surveillance; wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, electronic locks, security systems, lighting systems, garage door openers, electric gates, televisions, cameras, video streaming devices, video recording and video receiving devices, digital video recorders and other electronic devices; electronic locks; entry door touch pads; electronic and wireless control panels for security and home automation systems; downloadable software applications for monitoring a user's home, office and other facilities, for use over the Internet, mobile devices, wireless Internet networks or systems and other computer and electronic communication networks; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to remotely control electronic locks, alarm systems, lights, garage door openers, electric gates, wireless local area network enabled plug outlets, televisions, video streaming devices, digital video recorders and receivers, wireless local area network enabled cameras and other electronic devices; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to identify and communicate with persons at their door; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to monitor their home, office and other facilities; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to remotely control wireless-enabled electronic devices | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |