Drawing for INTEGRITY FIRST

USPTO serial 87416158

INTEGRITY FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRITY FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna A. Tobin

DONNA A. TOBIN FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ, PC488 MADISON AVENUE FL. 10NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, promoting public awareness of the need for opposing and combatting government corruption and the betrayal of the public trust, including the failure to protect the equal rights of the most vulnerable and the failure to respect the rule of law, through investigative journalism, research, and dissemination of public informationACTIVE—
045Charitable services, namely, legal services directed toward opposing and combatting government corruption and the betrayal of the public trust, including the failure to protect the equal rights of the most vulnerable and the failure to respect the rule of lawACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 28, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 28, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance