USPTO serial 87416385
CAMISUENO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAMISUENO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sanming, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lai Yishu
P.O. BOX 2409,SUZHOU CITYJIANGSU PROVINCE, 215028CHINAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Air cushions, not for medical purposes; Air mattresses, not for medical purposes; Beds for household pets; Bolsters; Chaise lounges; Cushions; Deck chairs; Dog kennels; Fixed non-metal dispensers for dog waste bags; Furniture; Head-rests; Inflatable furniture; Kennels for household pets; Nesting boxes for household pets; Pet cushions; Scratching posts for cats; Sleeping mats; Sofas; Fitted fabric furniture covers; Pet cushions; Storage racks | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2019 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |