Drawing for COREPLEX

USPTO serial 87416791

COREPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COREPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne H. Peck

ANNE H. PECK COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W.; SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009semiconductor chips; integrated circuits; microprocessorsACTIVEJul 11, 2016
045licensing of intellectual property, namely, intellectual property relating to integrated circuits, microprocessors, and semiconductor chipsACTIVEJul 11, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 3, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Apr 26, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance